Tag Archive | safety

GMO’s and Nano’s, I SAY NO-NO!!!

nano (1)

What the heck is a nanoparticle? Surprisingly, they’ve been in our food supply and products we use everyday for decades; much like GMO’s. Nano-Technology, like GMO’s, is a totally unregulated field of science. The technology is for the building of small machines. Now that really sounds scary! Nano particles are used in the producing, processing, and packaging of our foods. Teeny, tiny bits of foreign matter used in packaging material to detect microbes; in dietary supplements, and in foods and drinks as food additives. They are used to “prevent caking,¬†deliver nutrients and prevent bacterial growth.” But are they something we should beconsumer prod. nano digesting?

OK– so, Nanoparticles are all around us. I’m asking, are they harmful?

The answer is: they say they really don’t know. ūüė¶

Nanoparticles are ultra fine materials that vary between 1 to 100 in size. A NANO_SCALE-Illustration_FoE_DK-EDIT2-722890nanometer is a unit that measures length. It is one billionth of a meter.

It’s a million times smaller than a ¬†millimeter.¬†Nanoparticles, which range from 1-100 nanometers in size, are roughly the same size as biomolecules such as proteins, antibodies, and membrane receptors. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131107094021.htm

“There are 150-600 nano food and 400-500 nano food packaging application on store shelves.” They are added with no warning and no safety testing. Sounds a lot like GMO’s, huh?

A new study reveals that nanoparticles are being used in everything from beer to baby drinks despite a lack of safety information. nano

‘The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently does not specifically require nanoparticles to be proved safe but does require manufacturers to provide tests showing that the food goods employing them”‚ÄĒbe it beer or baby products‚ÄĒare not harmful. “Industry would bear the burden of demonstrating the safety of the material under its intended conditions of use,” says FDA spokesperson Christopher Kelly. “Nanoparticle versions of [FDA-approved] materials may well be new materials” that would trigger new investigations, “and this is considered on a case-by-case basis.” ¬†¬†http://www.scientificamerican.com/.

Funny, this self policing by the manufacturers didn’t work at all with genetically engineered foods. I’m curious to know, what makes them think its going to work with this???

Previous research has shown that nanoparticles can be absorbed by the skin, inhaled, or ingested; cross into the brain, or blood and even taken up by cells. While they say they aren’t harmful, let’s investigate a bit.

Titanium dioxide, “one of the top chemicals produced, worldwide,” ¬†is used in everything from paint to food and cosmetics. Its a mineral pigment, opaque, used in sunscreen, ¬†and in color cosmetics. It is thought to be carcinogenic, and they can penetrate your cells and cause DNA damage when exposed to sunlight. You actually put this in Sunscreen? DUH? There is also some fear that this may lead to skin cancer. Oh yea, this nano titanium is known to kill beneficial bacteria and soil microbes.

A study by Churg et. al. at the University of British Columbia in their paper “Induction of Fibrogenic Mediators by Fine and Ultrafine Titanium Dioxide in Rat Tracheal Explants” (1999) found that ultrafine particles of the anatase form of titanium dioxide, which are less than 0.1 microns, are pathogenic or disease-causing.

Table 1: Measurements of Mineral Pigment Particles
Particle Size Measurement
Coarse Less than 10 microns
Fine Less than 2.5 microns
Ultrafine (nanoparticles) Less than 0.1 microns or 100 nanometres
etcgroup.org
Table 2: Particle Size and Entry into the Human Body
Nanoparticle Size Entry Point
70 nanometres Alveolar surface of lung
50 nanometres Cells
30 nanometres Central Nervous System
Less than 20 nanometres No data yet
etcgroup.org

Danger to the cell depends on the size of the particle. What is interesting about this study is that the smaller the particle, the more toxic it became.

Nano facts from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

  • Nanotechnology is technology on the atomic and molecular scale
  • A nanometre (nm) is one billionth of a metre
  • A nanoparticle is a particle with one or more external dimensions in the size range 1 nm — 100 nm
  • The aspect ratio between a nanoparticle and a football is similar to that between a football and Earth
  • Nanotechnology is working on a scale of 100 nm (which corresponds approximately to the size of a virus) down to the size of atoms, about 0.1 nm

“Toddler Health is a nutritional supplement containing nano iron particles that claims to offer toddlers increased bio-availability. Canola Active cooking oil contains NutraLease, a nutraceutical technology that uses nano-capsules to enhance the delivery of nutrients. A preservative known as AquaNova contains nano capsules of water insoluble substances to increase absorption in the body. McDonald‚Äôs burger packages contain nano-spheres that require less water and less time and energy to dry. Miller Beer bottles are made from Imperm, a plastic imbued with clay nanoparticles that are as hard as glass but stronger and provide longer shelf life. – ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† See more at: ¬†http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/sept09/nanotechnology_parallels_

All this sounds alarming to me. When I think of all the damage that is being done from the introduction of GMO’s into our food supply; the idea of nanoparticles being added, “untested” is reason to fear. I’m appalled. Nanotechnology has made the nano foods industry a $6 billion market. And people are the guinea pigs, AGAIN, testing it. totally unaware.

I’m no scientist, but I am a researcher, I can read. And I can see from the information that is available out there that this is headed for disaster. There’s enough sickness and disease already, and they seem content in continuing to make it that way.

Major food companies, such as General Mills, Kraft, Nestle, PepsiCo, Cadbury-Schweppes, and Unilever are making the nano food and nano packaging a mainstream application. Monsanto isn’t involved in this, BUT, Syngenta, Cargill, Dupont, BASF, are all involved in some type of research or application of this technology. And they are affiliated with Monsanto, that’s enough for me to be concerned.

Creams graphic.jpg

Some of the initial studies reveal some cancer causing potential. Nano silver, used as a coating in tableware, has been found to be “toxic to the liver,¬†brain, and stem cells and may harm beneficial bacteria.”¬†image2

This stuff is “potent and toxic, even in small quantities.” And it also needs to be labeled like GMO’s, so at least we know, its our right…nanoparticles-in-food-vitamins-pharmaceutical-drugs-may-harm-your-health

Here is a partial list of items known to contain nanoparticles of zinc oxide, nanotechnology-cosmetics-1-537x402titanium dioxide, and/or silver:  Sunscreens, Cosmetics, Dietary  Supplements, Food and Beverage grroup-of-4-2items, Appliances, Computers, Clothing. This post would go on too long if I tried to name all of the products that are using nanoparticles.    images (2)

The list goes on and on. Go to¬†http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi/products/ for a list of 1791 products that contain nanoparticles. This list includes food and non food items. You can browse by category. Plan to be amazed! I’d say if the word “nano” appears anywhere on a product it should be a NO-NO to you.

nanoparticles accumulate

As always, I share because I care about you and the issues that affect us all. Let me hear from you…Oh, would you do me a favor and like my page. Thanks…

Additional sources:
The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. www.nanotechproject.org.
Associated Press. ‚ÄúScientists concerned about nanotech products.‚ÄĚ November 13, 2008.
Food and Water Watch. ‚ÄúThe Risks of Nanotechnology.‚ÄĚ September 2008
Ball, Philip, ‚ÄúNanoparticles in Sun Creams Can Stress Brain Cells.‚Ä̬†Nature. June 21, 2006.
KABC-TV. ‚ÄúStudies Show Nanoparticles Used in Sunscreens and Makeup can Harm the Environment.‚ÄĚ March 26, 2009
‚ÄúDown on the Farm: The Impact of Nano-scale Technologies on Food and Agriculture.‚ÄĚ ETC Group. November 2004. –

Advertisements

Killing Me Softly….with my food.

file7101237575173

Where do I begin. I have begun to be very concerned with the safety of the food in this country. Un-labeled genetically modified ingredients are prevalent in our food. No adequate safety testing has been done on this food. It is more than probable that this is one of the reasons for the increase in allergies, asthma, heart disease, and cancer.

In 2011, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. Needless to say my journey was about to begin. I was told I needed immediate surgery, although my cancer was stage 0, they called it Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ. Scared me for sure. I was determined not to have this surgery, so I began my own research. Here is where my introduction to GMO and chemicals as well as pesticides began. I found to my amazement a large quantity of chemicals and pesticides were being used on our food that were carcinogenic. So my first order of business was to change the way I was eating. No more chemicals and pesticides. I started eating organics foods, or locally grown by small farmers. The mass production of food is where the problem lies, we must fear the big producers.

Then I read about Genetically Modified Organisms in my food. My last post gave you an overview of the process. Monsanto was a name that continued to pop up. Monsanto is a chemical company that is now the world’s largest seed corporation. Monsanto’s products cause death. There is definite link to Monsanto’s GMO crops and cancer tumors.Read more at¬†¬†http://www.naturalnews.com/037249_GMO_study_cancer_tumors_organ_damage.html

IMG_0118 file0001506313780

What is genetically engineered in the US?

Right now soy, corn, cotton, and canola are the big four. Soy and Corn derivatives are in most processed foods. If it comes in a box from the supermarket, it is probably genetically engineered. All four are used in vegetable oil.*

file9421273408476

This is a no-no…

In order to avoid eating GMOs, you must: 1. Buy organic, which is not allowed to use GM inputs   2. Buy products that are labeled Non-GMO   3. Buy products listed on a Non-GMO Shopping Guide, or   4. Read labels and avoid the at risk ingredients, such as soy protein isolate, lecithin, high fructose corn syrup, dextrose, maltodextrin, and all corn derivatives, canola and cottonseed oil, etc.*

 

*Visit www.ResponsibleTechnology.org to find more information on how to avoid GM foods, as well as a shopping guide.

In May 2009, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine released a policy paper urging all doctors to prescribe non-GMO diets for everyone, stating that animal studies show that GM food is linked to infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, organ damage, and gastrointestinal problems. They called for a moratorium on GMOs, and mandatory labeling.

The fight for labeling is ongoing and hard. We need to make our voices heard in Congress, and say no to GMO and if not, please at least label it so we have a true choice. I’m ready to fight…are you?